The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has issued the Technology Risk Management Guidelines to help financial institutions manage their technology risks. The guidelines cover a wide range of topics, from establishing a sound technology risk governance framework to implementing technical controls to protect IT systems.

As part of our Compliance practice, our experts help financial institutions by conducting a comprehensive Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) Cybersecurity Compliance Audit to ensure that our customers meet the requirements of the TRM Guidelines.

The TRM Guidelines are designed to help Financial Institutions:

  • Understand their cyber risk exposure
  • Develop and implement a risk-based approach to cyber risk management
  • Mitigate cyber risks and respond to cyber incidents

The guidelines are not prescriptive, but they provide Financial Institutions with a framework to develop their own technology risk management programs. The guidelines are also aligned with international standards, such as the ISO 27001 standard for information security management.

Key requirements of the MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

The TRM Guidelines set out a number of key requirements for Financial Institutions, including:

  • Establishing a sound cyber risk governance framework
  • Conducting regular risk assessments
  • Implementing appropriate technical controls
  • Raising awareness of cyber risks among staff
  • Responding to and recovering from cyber incidents

1. Establishing a sound technology risk governance framework

The MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines emphasize the importance of having a sound cyber risk governance framework in place. This framework should be led by the board of directors and should involve all levels of the organization. The framework should include the following elements:

  • A clear statement of technology risk appetite
  • A process for identifying, assessing, and mitigating cyber risks
  • A process for monitoring and reviewing cyber risks
  • A process for reporting on cyber risks to the board of directors

2. Conducting regular risk assessments

Financial Institutions are required to conduct regular risk assessments to identify and assess their cyber risks. The risk assessments should be based on a risk-based approach, taking into account the organization’s size, complexity, and risk profile. The risk assessments should also consider the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

3. Implementing appropriate technical controls

Financial Institutions are required to implement appropriate technical controls to protect their IT systems from cyber attacks. The technical controls should be proportionate to the organization’s risk profile and should be regularly reviewed and updated.

4. Raising awareness of cyber risks among staff

Financial Institutions are required to raise awareness of cyber risks among their staff. This includes educating staff about the latest threats and vulnerabilities, as well as the importance of following security procedures.

5. Responding to and recovering from cyber incidents

Financial Institutions are required to have a plan in place for responding to and recovering from cyber incidents. The plan should include the following elements:

  • A process for detecting and responding to cyber incidents
  • A process for containing and mitigating the impact of cyber incidents
  • A process for restoring IT systems and data

The TRM Guidelines are an important resource for Financial Institutions in managing their cyber risks. By following the guidelines, Financial Institutions can help to protect themselves from cyber attacks and mitigate the impact of any incidents that do occur.

Conclusion

The MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines are a comprehensive set of guidelines that provide Financial Institutions with a framework for managing their cyber risks. The guidelines are aligned with international standards and are designed to help FIs understand their cyber risk exposure, develop and implement a risk-based approach to cyber risk management, mitigate cyber risks, and respond to cyber incidents.

By following the TRM Guidelines, Financial Institutions can help to protect themselves from cyber attacks and mitigate the impact of any incidents that do occur.

Our compliance experts can help you navigate the requirements of the MAS TRM Guidelines and carry out a comprehensive Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) Cybersecurity Compliance Audit to ensure that you meet the requirements of the TRM Guidelines.

Speak To Our Experts


First Name*

Last Name*

Work Email*

Company*

Mobile*

Client Speak

Reference Articles

UIDAI Information Security Policy for Authentication User Agencies

The UIDAI Information Security Policy for Authentication User Agencies (AUAs) and KYC User Agencies (KUAs) is a comprehensive set of guidelines designed to ensure the secure handling, transmission, and storage of Aadhaar data.

IRDAI Guidelines on Information and Cyber Security

The IRDAI Guidelines on Information and Cyber Security sets out a comprehensive guidelines that the insurance industry must comply with to combat escalating cyber threats. As a CERT-In Empanelled Security Auditor, Security Brigade can help customers comply with many of these requirements.

RBI Cyber Security Framework for Banks

The RBI Cyber Security Framework for Banks sets out a comprehensive list that banks must comply with to combat escalating cyber threats. As a CERT-In Empanelled Security Auditor, Security Brigade can help customers comply with many of these requirements.

Code Review for PCI DSS Compliance

One of the key requirements of PCI DSS is to perform regular secure code reviews of all custom code that touches cardholder data. This helps to identify and fix security vulnerabilities in the code before it is put into production.

Vulnerability Assessment vs Penetration Testing

The main difference between Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing is the level of detail and the level of interaction with the network. An Vulnerability Assessment is a high-level assessment that identifies vulnerabilities, while an Penetration Testing is a low-level assessment that exploits vulnerabilities.

OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security Risks

The OWASP Top 10 is a standard awareness document for developers and web application security professionals. It represents a broad consensus about the most critical security risks to web applications. The document is updated every three years to reflect the changing threat landscape.

Types of Red Team Assessments

Red Team Assessments can be classified into three main types: external, internal, and hybrid. External assessments focus on the organization’s external attack surface, while internal assessments focus on the internal network and systems.

Attack Surface Management in Red Teams

Attack Surface Management is a valuable tool that can help organizations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their red team assessments.

Importance of SOC 2 Compliance for SaaS Organizations

SaaS organizations that are SOC 2 compliant can demonstrate to their customers that they have taken the necessary steps to protect their data. This can help to build trust and confidence, and it can also open up new markets and opportunities.

MAS TRM Compliance Audit

A comprehensive cybersecurity compliance audit to meet the requirements of the The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)

Juby P - Botree Software
{In an age where cyber threats constantly evolve, having a trusted ally like Security Brigade is essential. The Security Brigade team consistently delivered well-structured reports that spotlighted critical vulnerabilities and potential security weaknesses. These reports were accompanied by actionable recommendations, allowing our teams to prioritize and rectify issues efficiently. Professionalism, responsive, and depth of expertise well appreciated, and we are happy to have engaged Security Brigade as our VAPT provider.
Juby Pappachan
Senior Manager - InfoSec, Botree Software
Gobinda Chandra Patra - ISIT Consultants
{We started working with Security Brigade as a cost effective solution for doing VAPT for applications and networks for our customers. But we have developed a great partnership with Security Brigade over the last 6+ years. They treat our customers as their own customers and provide solutions and do the activities as per agreed terms and sometimes even they don’t mind going beyond and deliver to customer. We will be happy to continue working with them and refer others as well.
Gobinda Chandra Patra
CEO and Co-Founder, ISIT Consultants
Peter Theobald Author Of Cybersecurity Demystified
{I have been using Security Brigade services for the past fourteen years. In my role as leading the cybersecurity Initiative at multiple national system integrators in India, I have worked with them to provide VA/PT, External Attack Surface Management, and Red Teaming services to large corporate customers. In each case they have met or exceeded expectations resulting in repeat business. I have no hesitation recommending their services for quality conscious customers wanting to enhance their security posture.
Peter Theobald, A.C.A
Cybersecurity Industry Veteran, Author of Cybersecurity Demystified